How to Let Go of an Underperforming Sales Rep

Letting go of an underperforming sales rep comes down to four things: confirm that the problem is the person and not the system, give them a clear, written, time-bound chance to improve, decide based on agreed metrics, and then handle the exit quickly, respectfully and legally. Most founders get this wrong in one of two ways. Some fire too fast, before they've checked whether the territory, quota or onboarding was the real issue. Others wait far too long, hoping things will turn around while the pipeline and the team's morale quietly erode.

I've been on both sides of this as a founder. I've kept people months longer than I should have. I've also had to admit that a "bad rep" was actually a rep I had set up to fail. This post is the process I now follow. It's practical, a bit uncomfortable, and built around the reality of small B2B teams, including the specifics of doing this in Turkey.

Is it really a performance problem, or a system problem?

Before you judge the person, judge the setup you gave them. In my experience, a meaningful share of "underperformance" in small sales teams is caused by the company, not the rep.

Ask yourself these questions honestly:

• Was the quota realistic? If your quota was based on what you, the founder, closed with your network and credibility, a new rep will almost never hit it. A quota should come from pipeline math, not hope.
• Did they have enough ramp time? A rep who's three months into a six-month sales cycle hasn't failed yet. They simply haven't had time to close anything. I wrote about realistic timelines in how long a new sales rep takes to ramp up, and it's worth re-reading before any termination decision.
• Was the lead flow there? If you promised 40 qualified conversations a month and delivered 12, the rep's numbers will reflect your marketing, not their skill.
• Did they have a playbook? If the only "training" was shadowing you on four calls, the rep was improvising.
• Did the ICP or product change mid-way? Pivots kill rep performance. Founders tend to forget this when reviewing the numbers.

A simple test: if you replaced this person tomorrow with an average rep, would that rep do meaningfully better under the same conditions? If the honest answer is "probably not," fix the system first. Otherwise you'll fire one person and hire the next into the same trap.

What should you measure before making a decision?

Revenue alone is a lagging indicator. In a long B2B cycle, it can take two or three quarters to tell you something you could have known in six weeks. Look at the full funnel and compare the rep against a baseline: other reps, your own numbers, or the targets you agreed on at hiring.

Here's a practical example. Imagine a rep three months past ramp, measured weekly:

| Metric | Target | Rep's average | |---|---|---| | Outbound activities (calls, emails, LinkedIn touches) | 250 | 240 | | Conversations held | 25 | 22 | | Discovery meetings booked | 8 | 7 | | Meetings converted to proposals | 30% | 8% | | Proposals converted to closed deals | 25% | 20% |

This rep is not lazy. Activity is fine, and so are meetings. The breakdown is in discovery-to-proposal conversion: they book meetings but can't qualify or build a case. That's a specific, coachable skill gap. It's very different from a rep doing 80 activities a week when the target is 250, which is usually an effort or fit problem.

Break underperformance into three buckets, because each one needs a different response:

1. Effort problem: low activity and low engagement. This is usually the fastest to diagnose and the hardest to fix with coaching.
2. Skill problem: good activity, poor conversion at a specific stage. This is often fixable with focused coaching.
3. Fit problem: the person is capable but wrong for this role. Maybe they're a great account manager stuck in a hunting role, or an enterprise seller selling a low-ticket product.

Call recordings help enormously here. Listening to five discovery calls tells you more than five weeks of CRM reports.

Have you actually tried coaching?

This is the uncomfortable question. Many founders say "I've given feedback" when what they mean is "I've expressed frustration in a Monday meeting." That's not coaching.

Real coaching means picking one skill, showing what good looks like, practicing it, and reviewing actual calls together. It means doing that weekly, not once. If you haven't done this, you don't yet know whether the rep can improve. My approach is laid out in how to coach sales reps without micromanaging them, and the core idea is simple: coach behaviors, not outcomes.

If you've done structured coaching for four to six weeks and nothing has moved, that's real information. Now you can move to a formal plan.

How long should you give a rep to improve?

For most small B2B teams, a 30 to 60 day performance improvement plan (PIP) is the right window. Thirty days works for activity and effort issues, because those can change within a week if the person wants them to. Sixty days is fairer for conversion or skill issues, especially when your cycle is long.

Anything shorter is a formality before a firing everyone can see coming. Anything longer usually means you're avoiding the decision.

What does a good improvement plan look like?

A good PIP is not a threat letter. It's a written agreement that makes success clear and possible. It should include:

• The specific gap, stated with numbers. For example: "Discovery-to-proposal conversion averaged 8% over the last 10 weeks against a 30% target."
• The target, which must be measurable and realistic. For example: "Reach at least 20% conversion over the next 8 weeks, with at least 6 proposals sent."
• Leading indicators, so neither side waits until day 60 to know. For example: "Each discovery call follows the qualification framework, reviewed in weekly call reviews."
• The support you'll provide, such as weekly one-on-ones, two recorded call reviews per week, and a role-play session on qualification.
• Check-in dates: weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8.
• The consequence, stated plainly: if targets aren't met, employment may end.

Deliver the plan in a conversation, not just an email. Say clearly: "I want this to work, and here is exactly what working looks like." Then follow through on your side of it. A PIP where the manager skips the promised coaching sessions isn't fair, and it rarely holds up if challenged later.

A note from experience: roughly speaking, reps on a well-run plan tend to go one of three ways. Some improve and stay. Some realize it's not for them and start looking on their own. Some don't improve and you part ways. All three outcomes are better than limbo.

How do you know it's time to let them go?

You're ready to make the call when most of these are true:

• The rep has had a fair ramp period for your sales cycle.
• The system issues (leads, quota, playbook) have been addressed or ruled out.
• You've delivered real, documented coaching.
• A written improvement plan ran its full course and the targets weren't met.
• You can explain the decision in two sentences, using numbers, without getting emotional.

There are also signals that should speed things up: dishonesty in the CRM (fake activities, inflated pipeline), mistreating prospects, damaging client relationships, or behavior that hurts the team. These aren't performance issues. They're conduct issues, and they don't deserve a 60-day runway.

One more test I use: "If this person resigned tomorrow, would I feel relief or disappointment?" If it's relief, you already know the answer.

What are the legal considerations in Turkey?

If you're employing reps in Turkey, the process matters as much as the decision. I'm not a lawyer, and you should always involve one or a qualified HR/payroll advisor before you terminate anyone. Here are the general points founders should be aware of under the Turkish Labor Law (No. 4857):

• Probation period: Employment contracts can include a probation period, generally up to two months. During that time either side can end the contract without notice or severance. This is one reason it pays to evaluate a new rep's early behaviors seriously rather than waiting.
• Notice periods: Outside probation, statutory notice periods depend on tenure. They range from two weeks for very short tenure up to eight weeks for employees with more than three years of service. Employers can pay in lieu of notice.
• Severance (kıdem tazminatı): Employees with at least one year of service are generally entitled to severance when the employer terminates for reasons other than just cause. It's calculated on years of service and capped at an official ceiling that is updated periodically.
• Job security provisions: In workplaces with 30 or more employees, employees with at least six months of seniority are covered by job security rules. Termination must then rest on a valid reason related to performance, conduct or business needs, and the employee must normally be given a chance to respond before a performance-based termination. Documented performance plans matter a lot here.
• Commissions and bonuses: Check your contract and commission plan for what happens to earned but unpaid commission on deals in progress. Ambiguity here is the most common source of disputes I've seen in sales teams.

Budget for the exit before you need it. If you've read what a sales rep really costs in Turkey, you'll know the visible salary is only part of the picture. Notice pay, severance and unused leave belong in that calculation too.

How do you actually have the conversation?

Keep it short, clear and humane. The decision is made, so this isn't a negotiation or a debate. Here's the structure I use:

1. Choose the timing well. Do it early in the week and early in the day, in private, with a second person (HR or a co-founder) present if possible. Avoid Friday evenings and avoid the day before a holiday.
2. Get to the point within the first minute. For example: "We've reviewed the results of the improvement plan, and we've decided to end your employment. Today is your last working day." Long preambles are cruel, because the person spends five minutes guessing.
3. Give the reason briefly, once. Refer to the plan and the numbers. Don't relitigate every call or deal.
4. Explain the practical details. Cover the final pay, notice, severance if applicable, commissions owed, equipment return, and access to email and the CRM.
5. Protect their dignity. Offer to let them say goodbye to the team or leave quietly, whichever they prefer. Offer a reference for what they did well, if you honestly can.
6. Then stop talking. Let them react. Don't fill the silence with justifications.

The whole conversation should take 15 to 20 minutes. Have the paperwork ready, and prepare system access changes to happen right after the meeting, not during it.

What happens to their pipeline and accounts?

This is the step founders forget, and it's where the real revenue damage happens. Within 48 hours:

• Export and review their full pipeline. Look at every open deal, its stage and the next step.
• Reassign active deals to yourself or another rep, prioritizing anything in proposal or negotiation stage.
• Contact key prospects personally. A short, honest message works: "Ayşe has moved on from the company; I'll be your point of contact going forward." Prospects care far more about continuity than about the reason.
• Audit the CRM data. Underperforming reps often have the messiest records. Expect some "opportunities" to evaporate once someone actually calls them.

If you suddenly have a gap in pipeline generation while you rehire, that's a good moment to consider outside help. Some founders bring in an external partner like SAAS Corner for outbound lead generation to keep top-of-funnel activity running, so the next hire doesn't inherit an empty pipeline.

How do you tell the rest of the team?

Tell them the same day, briefly and respectfully. For example: "Mert is no longer with the company as of today. His accounts are being covered by Elif and me. If you have questions about specific deals, come to me." Don't share performance details. The team usually knows more than you think, and gossip fills any vacuum you leave.

Done right, a fair exit actually raises team trust. High performers notice when underperformance is tolerated forever, and they notice when someone is treated badly on the way out. Handling both well tells them the standards are real and the company is decent.

What should you change before hiring the next rep?

Every termination is feedback on your hiring and onboarding. Before you post the next job ad, do a short post-mortem:

• Were there warning signs in the interview that you overlooked? Tighten your process with sharper sales rep interview questions that test the exact skill this person lacked.
• Was the role clearly defined: hunter or farmer, SMB or enterprise?
• Did you set leading-indicator targets from week one, or only revenue targets?
• Did you use the probation period as a genuine evaluation window?

Write down three things you'll do differently. Otherwise you'll repeat the same hire with a different name.

FAQ

How long should a sales rep have before being let go for underperformance?

A rep should have at least a full ramp period that matches your sales cycle, which is often three to six months in B2B. That should be followed by a documented 30 to 60 day improvement plan if results fall short. Conduct issues like dishonesty or mistreating clients are different and can justify much faster action.

Should I put every underperforming rep on a performance improvement plan?

Yes, in most cases, because it gives the rep a fair, clear chance and gives you documentation if the decision is ever challenged. In Turkey this documentation matters especially for employees covered by job security provisions. The plan only works if it's specific, measurable and backed by real coaching from you.

What do I owe a sales rep when I terminate them in Turkey?

Typically you owe final salary, notice pay or a notice period based on tenure, and unused annual leave. You also owe severance (kıdem tazminatı) if the employee has at least one year of service and the termination isn't for just cause. Earned commissions depend on your contract and commission plan, so always confirm the specifics with a lawyer or payroll advisor.

Is it better to fire quickly or give more chances?

It's better to be decisive within a fair, predefined process than to rely on gut feeling in either direction. Firing before checking quota, leads and onboarding often repeats the same failure with the next hire. Waiting indefinitely hurts revenue, team morale and the rep, who deserves clarity about where they stand.

Conclusion

Letting go of an underperforming sales rep is one of the hardest parts of building a sales team, and one of the most important. Start by ruling out system problems. Diagnose whether the issue is effort, skill or fit. Coach properly, then run a written, time-bound improvement plan. If the numbers still don't move, make the decision, follow Turkish labor law carefully, have a short and humane conversation, and protect the pipeline and the team afterward. Most importantly, turn the experience into a better hiring and onboarding process, so you face this situation less often.

If you're working through a tough team decision or building your sales organization from the ground up, I'm always happy to compare notes. [Get in touch with me here](/).

Related Posts

• When to Stop Founder-Led Sales (And Hand It Off)
• How to Land Your First 10 B2B Customers
• What Does a Sales Rep Really Cost in Turkey?
• How to Price B2B Services for Turkish Companies